
City councilman Reid Hedgepeth who is serving his first term as an elected official seems not to understand that we live in a democracy where you win some battles and lose others has taken it upon himself to chastise fellow council member Wanda Halbert.
In an email sent to her on Thursday he suggested that Halbert was out of place for voting against the wishes of the group from the Galloway area that he and Larry Godwin and Richard Smith of Fed-Ex met with on last week.
Hedgepeth must realize that he has no more authority than any other council member and his superior attitude will get him nothing but disappointed. Hedgepeth and his group has never addressed the killing of Duanna Johnson or asked for an investigation into the various killings by police that have left questions in the minds of some who believe that there are rouge cops out of control. Hedgepeth concern is that of the White citizens that elected him to office along with the concerns of groups like Memphis Tomorrow.
Reid refuses to understand that Black council members also have citizens that elected them to office that understand that 200 more police officers will not solve the crime problem who are concerned about the questionable deaths of several young men at the hands of the MPD that the council has refused to addressed.
Even though Hedgepeth sent an email chastising Halbert he and other White council members and Whites in general need to understand that gone are the days that Black people bow to the will of Whites just because thats what they want.
HERE'S HEDGEPETH'S EMAIL:
--- On Thu, 11/20/08, dayton@tmo.blackberry.net <dayton@tmo.blackberry.net> wrote:
Wanda
I believe you when you say that you are trying to serve the public's interest, but it's your approach that I think is flawed. We have already agreed to look the hiring practices of the MPD, and in fact I put that in writing as a friendly amendment to my resolution on Tuesday night. The problem is that this is the ONLY thing you seem to want to address, and alone it will not solve the problem. There very well may be some qualified applicants being turned away for the wrong reasons, but I do not believe we will get the full complement of MPD officers from resolving this issue alone. These examples seem to be the exception and not the rule, as most people are rejected for far more serious reasons (if they even show up at all). What you are trying to do here is akin to putting a band-aid over a gunshot wound!
We need to pursue EVERY option available to us in finding more qualified officers, which is why I want to not only address the MPD's hiring practices (as you keep railing on about), but also to broaden our pool of potential applicants. Neither of these on their own are likely to resolve the crime problem in this city, but only by using every option at our disposal will we ever be able to protect our citizens. So, again, it's not an "either/or" scenario . We can do both, which is essentially what the task force we assembled told us to do (among even more options we ought to be pursuing).
At the end of the day, though, people are losing hope and are leaving this city because of crime. Our tax base is leaving. Our jobs are leaving. And we sent them the worst possible message we could have sent them on Tuesday night, and that is that we are basically unwilling to do what so many other cities have done in order to protect their population. We are limiting ourselves needlessly here, and the reason people are up in arms about it is because they realize that and are as frustrated and disappointed as I am about it. You can try to blame the media all you want, but that's the reality of the situation.
I am always open to any suggestions that you and the other opposing council members have for addressing crime in this city, but you have beaten this one to death and are "selling past the close." We are addressing it. What ELSE do you propose?
Regards,
Reid
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld
HERE'S HALBERT RESPONSE:
Reid:
It is rather disturbing when some (especially women) aggressively stand for or address concerns, there is always the, "but it's your approach that is flawed" notion. Not sure if that is suggesting I need to do something the way someone expects or thinks I should. I don't feel the need to justify my leadership approach. One could view such a statement as disrespectful arrogance but I am hopeful you intended it to be constructive.
I don't always agree with your approach, but I certainly respect and value your leadership nor do I feel the need to challenge it unless you display disrespect (of which I don't expect). Differences of views, opinions, and the ways in which we address them allow for great debate. The concerns surrounding how or why Memphis could not find a sufficient number of applicants was put on the table months ago, the very first day you expressed the interest in relaxing the residency requirement.
Shortly thereafter the inquiries of the other issues followed. To date, no one has done anything to address the concerns except get defensive, deny knowledge/inclusion, and put them on the back burner. From the beginning, it was asked to look into all the issues collectively, however, we're still only dealing with one, allowing non city/county residents to take jobs others may inappropriately have been denied. My conscious simply will not allow me to place that above all else. Contrary to your recollection, only the lack of a more competitive applicant pool was stated to be a potential barrier to hiring by the Task Force.
Dr. Essex of the HR department has announced new processes she and the director are developing to address the myriad of concerns. While the city ordinance clearly does not delegate the hiring authority of police be removed from HR, Dr. Essex has publicly stated, HR only prepares the letter of offer or rejection to potential employees - - maybe somewhere this is hiring, I will seek a stronger opinion by the City Attorney. I have a growing concerned the council is choosing to overturn the will of the voters. They have spoken on this issue twice and the last referendum received an overwhelming 70% approval. Are we abandoning the expressed wishes of the majority to satisfy the minority?
While I will not engage in additional back and forth discussion regarding this issue as my debate occurs before the pubic in open forum, I am working on recommending solutions to reduce crime and hire police in addition to requesting discussion of a plan of action from the mayor and his administration. In light of the recent divisiness created throughout our community by this issue, I am going to recommend our chairman consider the potential need to pursue discussion/work with Common Ground to help work with through obvious challenges we need to overcome.
Wanda Halbert, Councilwoman District 4Memphis City Councilwanda.halbert@memphistn.govwmhalbert@yahoo.com901 576-6786 Office
REID TAKE THIS AS AN OPEN INVITATION FOR YOU TO APPEAR ON MY RADIO SHOW TO EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS ON THIS MATTER I WILL EITHER CALL YOUR OFFICE CELL OR HOME ON TOMORROW TO SET THE DATE FOR NEXT WEEK. AN SURELY SINCE YOU WERE SO HAPPY TO APPEAR ON A WHITE TALK SHOW HOST PROGRAM YOU WANT BE "RACIST" AND NOT APPEAR LIVE IN THE STUDIO WITH ME WILL YOU?